Re: discourse forum test
scott-y6qSm6YX8/[email protected]
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.supercollider.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANmfHJ-K_+0avSQfg5uF-=52sxpPrunmUKdh0KmTKRLj+3R_1A@mail.gmail.com> |
The result of linking the mailing list to the discourse list is nice - long threads are picked up well, and navigation and usage is pretty snappy. For example: http://165.227.5.128/t/sc-users-tracking-synth-nodes-handling-polyphony-take-2/47/8 On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:51 AM Scott Carver <scott-y6qSm6YX8/[email protected]> wrote: > Slow meaning the web interface? Or slow meaning the backend? > > As a point of comparison, the lines forum (https://llllllll.co) is in our > ballpark in terms of scale (10k messages - I count ~5k for the last 5 years > of sc-users, so maybe 3x that for our entire history. they have 1k active > users, probably more than us). They sometimes struggle with storage issues, > but the site is snappy. > > I discovered it's possible to use github/google/facebook/etc to > authenticate, so people can post without doing the majordomo dance and > without flooding their inbox. Enabled GitHub and Google - GH works great > (Google doesn't like authing to an ip address). > > Incidentally, the sc-dev/sc-users mailing list authorization links sent in > emails are currently non-functional - the only way to confirm is via a > manual reply? I forget who manages the list these days? > > - S > > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 5:05 AM <julian.rohrhuber-QYZGCWsIODmAF8UT6DzBU6xOck334EZe@public.gmane.org> > wrote: > >> We’ve been using discourse for a year now in the university. It is really >> good for handling forum like things. But it is really slow, it is much more >> fun to write an email than an entry in discourse. >> >> The mirroring idea is nice. >> >> >> > On 16.02.2018, at 08:52, scott-y6qSm6YX8/[email protected] wrote: >> > >> > I've been messing around a little with discourse (the open source forum >> / mailing list backend). Specifically, I've been wondering if it could >> provide a replacement + upgrade for the mailing lists and nabble workflows >> as they are now. I'm not really *proposing* a replacement, as much as >> simply experimenting with that might look like. Feel free to mess around / >> create an account / etc. Don't post anything important, since I may take >> this down. >> > >> > The address is: >> > http://165.227.5.128/ >> > >> > A couple notes and thoughts: >> > >> > - In your user Preferences -> Emails, you can enable mailing list mode >> to make the entire forum behave like a traditional email list (you can >> reply to posts by email, and create threads by sending to >> sc-test-dev-y6qSm6YX8/[email protected] or sc-test-users-y6qSm6YX8/[email protected]). >> > >> > - I think I've got both mailing lists mirroring as categories on the >> forum. They're non-interactive (you can't reply), but I'm curious how the >> mirroring turns out. >> > >> > - The functionality around categories, user groups, notification and >> muting seems very awesome, and could be a big benefit for the kinds of >> sprawling discussions on sc-users/sc-dev >> > >> > - Code highlighting appears to work fine. I don't think it recognizes >> sclang specifically, but it does an okay job nonetheless. >> > >> > - Categories for "users" and "developers" (or embedded users, tidal >> users, etc etc) are more permeable than with two separate mailing lists. >> Threads can be moved if another category is more appropriate, and searches >> can easily cover both/all. >> > >> > - You can create wiki-editable posts? Seems interesting? >> > >> > >> >>