Re: discourse forum test

scott-y6qSm6YX8/[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.supercollider.devel
Message-ID <CANmfHJ-K_+0avSQfg5uF-=52sxpPrunmUKdh0KmTKRLj+3R_1A@mail.gmail.com>
The result of linking the mailing list to the discourse list is nice - long
threads are picked up well, and navigation and usage is pretty snappy. For
example:

http://165.227.5.128/t/sc-users-tracking-synth-nodes-handling-polyphony-take-2/47/8


On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:51 AM Scott Carver <scott-y6qSm6YX8/[email protected]> wrote:

> Slow meaning the web interface? Or slow meaning the backend?
>
> As a point of comparison, the lines forum (https://llllllll.co) is in our
> ballpark in terms of scale (10k messages - I count ~5k for the last 5 years
> of sc-users, so maybe 3x that for our entire history. they have 1k active
> users, probably more than us). They sometimes struggle with storage issues,
> but the site is snappy.
>
> I discovered it's possible to use github/google/facebook/etc to
> authenticate, so people can post without doing the majordomo dance and
> without flooding their inbox. Enabled GitHub and Google  - GH works great
> (Google doesn't like authing to an ip address).
>
> Incidentally, the sc-dev/sc-users mailing list authorization links sent in
> emails are currently non-functional - the only way to confirm is via a
> manual reply? I forget who manages the list these days?
>
> - S
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 5:05 AM <julian.rohrhuber-QYZGCWsIODmAF8UT6DzBU6xOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
>
>> We’ve been using discourse for a year now in the university. It is really
>> good for handling forum like things. But it is really slow, it is much more
>> fun to write an email than an entry in discourse.
>>
>> The mirroring idea is nice.
>>
>>
>> > On 16.02.2018, at 08:52, scott-y6qSm6YX8/[email protected] wrote:
>> >
>> > I've been messing around a little with discourse (the open source forum
>> / mailing list backend). Specifically, I've been wondering if it could
>> provide a replacement + upgrade for the mailing lists and nabble workflows
>> as they are now. I'm not really *proposing* a replacement, as much as
>> simply experimenting with that might look like. Feel free to mess around /
>> create an account / etc. Don't post anything important, since I may take
>> this down.
>> >
>> > The address is:
>> > http://165.227.5.128/
>> >
>> > A couple notes and thoughts:
>> >
>> > - In your user Preferences -> Emails, you can enable mailing list mode
>> to make the entire forum behave like a traditional email list (you can
>> reply to posts by email, and create threads by sending to
>> sc-test-dev-y6qSm6YX8/[email protected] or sc-test-users-y6qSm6YX8/[email protected]).
>> >
>> > - I think I've got both mailing lists mirroring as categories on the
>> forum. They're non-interactive (you can't reply), but I'm curious how the
>> mirroring turns out.
>> >
>> > - The functionality around categories, user groups, notification and
>> muting seems very awesome, and could be a big benefit for the kinds of
>> sprawling discussions on sc-users/sc-dev
>> >
>> > - Code highlighting appears to work fine. I don't think it recognizes
>> sclang specifically, but it does an okay job nonetheless.
>> >
>> > - Categories for "users" and "developers" (or embedded users, tidal
>> users, etc etc) are more permeable than with two separate mailing lists.
>> Threads can be moved if another category is more appropriate, and searches
>> can easily cover both/all.
>> >
>> > - You can create wiki-editable posts? Seems interesting?
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.