Re: Using Windows Language Portal for IDE string translation

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.supercollider.devel
Message-ID <CAB_zQYt9xfWUb6vyfxozVmr-tTgh4jmyzkRSgLUd448h39FmSw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018, 8:54 PM <[email protected]> wrote:

> 2018-04-04 16:58 GMT-03:00 <[email protected]>:
>>
>> Why expend effort for on-the-fly translation of technical documents when
>> people can just as easily copy and paste into an online translation service
>> like Google Translate or Bing Translator? You say it's easier, but it's not
>> without maintenance cost: it requires adding a new program to our
>> product/toolchain, and then maintaining its integration cross-platform. In
>> addition, you'd have to make sure that certain technical terms like the
>> names of methods and classes, the names of arguments and variables, and
>> other technical terms are not translated.
>>
>
> Yep, you are right, I was thinking more in a quark way and because changes
> have to propagate to the other languages, but individually is the same.
>
>
>> What do you think about performing a sloppy automated translation once as
>> a starting point for human translators?
>>
>
> I would have to read the original and the translation and compare them
> step by step, if it is good can save some time, emphasis on 'if'.
>

Would you mind trying it out on an example document, maybe something like
Object or Polymorphism? Then we have a real data point to work with. :) Try
first translating a paragraph or two from Object from scratch, then try
translating the same amount of text from Polymorphism using Google
Translate as a starting point. Which is faster, and which would you
actually prefer to do for the rest of the file?

-Brian

>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.