Re: scsynth.exe vs VoiceMeeter for online teaching
[email protected] Sun, 10 May 2020 17:19:50 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.supercollider.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Which audio API did you try for VoiceMeeter? I've just seen that VoiceMeeter supports all common Windows audio APIs (https://www.vb-audio.com/Voicemeeter/). For scsynth, the ASIO API should be your best bet. Christof On 10.05.2020 11:55, [email protected] wrote: >> So I would set both the meeting software and SC to use JACK ASIO? > With the "JackRouter" ASIO driver you can easily interconnect > applications on Windows as long as they support ASIO. But I suspect that > your meeting software won't support ASIO... > > Regarding your issue with VoiceMeeter + SC: > >> SuperCollider: PortAudio --> VoiceMeeter input: boots up but playing >> SinOsc.ar(440) produces only some randomly-timed very low frequency >> pulses. > Can you post the device list you get in SuperCollider? With portaudio > you can actually choose between several audio APIs (MME, DirectSound, > ASIO, WASAPI, WDM-KS), which can be a bit confusing for users not > familiar with Windows. Which audio API did you try for VoiceMeeter? > > Christof > > On 10.05.2020 03:04, [email protected] wrote: >> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 1:25 AM <[email protected]> wrote: >>> scsynth uses portaudio, so you should be able to just use the Jack ASIO >>> Driver. But you have to watch out for problems like these: >>> https://github.com/supercollider/supercollider/issues/4718 >> Consider me a Windows dummy. >> >> So I would set both the meeting software and SC to use JACK ASIO? >> >> I had been avoiding JACK because of the known JackRouter 64-bit issue. >> (Did we ever figure out why that prevented the server from booting?) >> >> Oh, while looking for the JackRouter issue, I saw this comment from a >> year ago: >> >> "SuperCollider uses a custom version of portaudio, so the problem >> might be there." -- >> https://github.com/supercollider/supercollider/issues/2742#issuecomment-505463694 >> >> >> So there might be a concrete reason why SC's PortAudio behavior is >> different from a few other PortAudio apps. >> >> hjh >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sc-dev mailing list >> >> info (subscription, etc.): >> http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/ea-studios/research/supercollider/mailinglist.aspx >> archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/ >> search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/ > > _______________________________________________ > sc-dev mailing list > > info (subscription, etc.): > http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/ea-studios/research/supercollider/mailinglist.aspx > archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/ > search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/ _______________________________________________ sc-dev mailing list info (subscription, etc.): http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/ea-studios/research/supercollider/mailinglist.aspx archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/ search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/