Re: Anyone wants to take on WebAssembly?
[email protected] Tue, 27 Oct 2020 23:02:42 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.supercollider.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
nice! what would be a good place to collect ideas and links? is a GH ticket the right place to track progress, or elsewhere? perhaps supercollider/rfcs ? best, .h.h. On 27/10/2020 21:39, [email protected] wrote: > Just wanted to say that Pd can already be compiled for WASM with > emscripten: https://mathr.co.uk/empd/ > > Maybe that can serve as a starting point? > > Christof > > On 27.10.2020 21:34, [email protected] wrote: >> hi folks, >> >> I know main devs were not particularly keen on spending time on an >> scsynth wasm target when I asked last time, but perhaps there are other >> people out there who would be interested in exploring that avenue? >> >> My personal interest got renewed after coming back to Scala.js for my >> client, and seeing that the JS back-end compiler these days is rock >> solid. I think it would be fantastic to make sound installations or >> sketches work in the client-side browser. I even hacked up a WebAudio >> UGen for my FScape non-realtime DSP system to test the thing -- see >> https://www.sciss.de/temp/soundprocesses.js/ -- but of course this was >> never designed for this scenario, so first of all, that's all JavaScript >> not Assembly, and it has a rather complicated streaming framework behind >> (Akka Stream) instead of the relatively simple scsynth graph processing; >> so no wonder it is not very efficient in CPU terms. >> >> I believe the sweet spot is to run the client through JS (that could be >> ScalaCollider/SoundProcesses, supercollider.js, or other languages that >> probably can run in the browser, like Python) and the server through >> wasm. Csound people tell me wasm support was quite a good addition. >> >> Now, as I've stated repeatedly, my C skills are very small, same for >> LLVM and emscripten, and I don't know how entangled the build targets >> for scsynth vs sclang are. But if anyone sees this as an opportunity to >> experiment, I'm happy to try to learn the necessary stuff to start >> building a branch of scsynth against wasm (if it's doable at all -- but >> why not?). >> >> Feel free to reply to the thread or ping me directly. >> >> Best, .h.h. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sc-dev mailing list >> >> info (subscription, etc.): >> http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/ea-studios/research/supercollider/mailinglist.aspx >> >> archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/ >> search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/ > > _______________________________________________ > sc-dev mailing list > > info (subscription, etc.): > http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/ea-studios/research/supercollider/mailinglist.aspx > > archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/ > search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/ _______________________________________________ sc-dev mailing list info (subscription, etc.): http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/ea-studios/research/supercollider/mailinglist.aspx archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/ search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/