Re: Building a Racket client for SC

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.supercollider.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>Hi! I'm building a Racket client for SC

I'd so love to use that!

>· instead of having to declare an Out.ar at the end of each synthdef, the
>last expression will be automagically wrapped around one and an out
>parameter will be added to the synthdef before sending it to the engine or
>writing it to a file.

Perhaps it is worth noting that, in spite of the name, Synths don't necessarily
need to perform synthesis require and therefore might not require an Out UGen
(or similar). A typical example would be a Synth that performs some analysis 
on an input signal (or Bus) and sends the result back to the language with SendReply.  

That would be more of an efficiency consideration, I guess. In most
cases, you could just set the output to zero.

::: sam :::

_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/ea-studios/research/supercollider/mailinglist.aspx
archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.