Re: SupercolliderAU
[email protected] Mon, 3 May 2021 11:45:13 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.supercollider.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAL8OTwB0eOJmqRmvjurNk_3gLwtv5K6RPZSnSEZFn_4ysNr-mQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Stephen, What versions of SC and Reaper are you using? I don't use Reaper much at this point, but I was able to get SCAU to load the server without crashing in Reaper 6.13. I did not, however, test extensively. On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 3:31 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for that. I do seem to have the SupercolliderAU server definitely > booting now - in part because now it crashes Reaper! > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 2:21 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Stephen, >> This is the code I used to get the server running in SCAU: >> >> u = Server.remote(\scau, NetAddr("127.0.0.1", 9989)); >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 7:59 PM David Matthews <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I do remember that the instructions in the documentation for connecting >>> to the server from SCAU are incorrect. I don’t know if they’ve been >>> updated. Correct instructions are in the thread from a few weeks back that >>> I started on this list. I’ll try to find and post when I get the chance. >>> >>> > On Apr 29, 2021, at 5:21 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > Dear List, >>> > >>> > Just wondering if there's any official word on the state of >>> SupercolliderAU and the AudioUnitBuilder quark? Googling seems to suggest >>> that it hasn't been properly maintained for some time, but with the odd >>> tantalising suggestion that someone has got it working. >>> > I've managed to build the au component, and get it to at least claim >>> it has booted, but plugging it into Reaper doesn't seem to do anything >>> other than indicate the port, and pinging doesn't do anything. Which all >>> supports the almost-but-not-quite tone I've been finding in other's posts. >>> So before I crack my head open on this, does anyone have a definitive >>> answer as to whether SupercolliderAU and the AudioUnitBuilder are actually >>> workable? Thanks! >>> >>