Re: Future of the lists
[email protected] Mon, 24 May 2021 09:22:55 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.supercollider.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Scott, I've been subscribed here for more than 10 years and this list has guided me through my newbie years and has made me the reasonably competent(-ish) SC coder I am now. Thank you for all the time and effort you've put into this over the years! Regarding the question, I would love it if the list could continue. I think I still prefer it over sysynth.org but I also think I could get used to the web forum so I would opt for option 1 or 3. I have a sense that option 2 might run the risk of the gap in the archive getting bigger and bigger while the list is becoming more and more obsolete. Why not "go out with a blast" instead? I would prefer option 1 though and would also support it with some money if necessary. Re. archiving: I maintain my own personal Thunderbird archive with hundreds of inspiring emails from this list containing "awesome things I must play around with sometime". Each one of them would warrant a little tutorial post on scsynth.org. I think I'll start doing that next time I'm bored. Best, Axel On 5/19/21 6:09 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Hi All, > > I’m afraid we need to have a discussion about the future of the mailing > lists. There are a number of issues, but the most immediate is that the > list archiving software is basically not up to modern standards and is > no longer maintained. It will need to be decommissioned, and is unlikely > to be immediately replaced as there’s low usage for it. > > There is a broader question about the list software itself. That /is/ > likely to be replaced, and the replacement would offer an archiving > facility, though there is no clear timescale, and at the moment it’s not > a high priority. > > The existing archive can be easily converted to a static one, which > should be able to provide a better search facility than currently (e.g. > Google), so that should not be lost in any case. > > So I think the options are as follows: > > 1. Move the lists to another host. JISCmail may be a possibility. > 2. Continue the lists and accept a gap in the archive, and hope that the > new hosting solution here will come sooner rather than later. > 3. Wind up the lists after a quarter of a century, move all discussion > to other fora (e.g. scsynth.org <http://scsynth.org>), and finalise the > archive. > > I have my own views on this, partly for personal reasons, but I would > like to hear from others before I say anything. I know people have > strong feelings about lists vs. web fora, etc., and any choice will > definitely have plusses and minuses. > > Whatever happens, it’s been something of an honour looking after > sc-users and sc-dev for the last 13 years since we migrated them in > 2008. I’ve been really proud and happy that Birmingham has been able to > support so much amazing activity, and such a great community! > > Let me know what you think, > > Scott - list admin > > _______________________________________________ sc-users mailing list info (subscription, etc.): http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/ea-studios/research/supercollider/mailinglist.aspx archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/ search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/