Re: Latest set of Win32 patches

Hi.

> A proper atomic mkstemp shouldn't be too hard.  tmpnam, open is
> probably acceptable, since we're not using it for anything secure, but
> I'll treat that as a fallback solution.  I'll likely make a new
> "posix" library to hold mkstemp and anything else we find is missing
> from Win32 (although I don't intend for it to turn into Cygwin!)

 From the mkstemp(3) man page:

   "Don't use this function, use tmpfile(3) instead.  It is better
    defined and more portable."

David Vrabel



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf