Re: Fedora RPMS for beta-2.2.5

Steve Holmes writes:

> On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 06:49:46PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>> I will include source RPMs, though.  If you feel up to it, you could grab a
>> test 2.2.5 tarball out of my source RPMs???
> 
> I don't have a redhat system so don't do RPM's.  Wouldn't it be just
> as easy to run a tarball up there as well?  Would this require all
> those odd ball dependencies even if I don't need them?

You'll need most of them in any case.  Zinf, in its present form, will not 
compile without metakit and gtkmm (and gtkmm needs libsigc++ to compile).

You can get away without having xosd and without ALSA.  I'm not too sure 
about id3lib.

>                                                        I mean, would I
> need to do an autoconf or is this already done like a normal release.
> Just wondering.

You don't need autoconf itself, per se.  You just need to have all the 
necessary prerequisites installed.

Someone else inserted a 2.2.5 tarball in there while I was uploading stuff.  
It wasn't me.  Wait for someone to 'fess up.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAHwPGx9p3GYHlUOIRAgCDAJoDgaTWTbnun+HGCxkbDzihCohzagCeNbNl
p8robs0hjHWBfz3zdlwaXuU=
=bg74
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----