Re: tools for writing xml or docbook
Sam Varshavchik <[email protected]> Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:19:26 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.zinf.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a MIME-formatted message. If you see this text it means that your E-mail software does not support MIME-formatted messages. --=_commodore.email-scan.com-14383-1100139568-0001-2 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mimegpg Erik Jones writes: > My question is, what tools do you folks recommend for writing in docbook > format. (it is the format I am presently looking into) emacs works for me. Depending on what I'm running at the moment, sometimes I find that xemacs's SGML mode is better than emacs'; sometimes it's the other way around. > I have been reading that working 'by hand' is generally not recommended > and I am 'googling' around, but I figured some advice couldn't hurt. I don't know where you read that, emacs always worked for me. But your message raised some interest, and brief googling found this: http://xml.openoffice.org/xmerge/docbook/ Sounds like a worthwhile investigation: write docbook stuff in OpenOffice=E2= =80=A6 --=_commodore.email-scan.com-14383-1100139568-0001-2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBkswux9p3GYHlUOIRAsQAAJ9ppXHmo5f0GKLXxMTKECixo//lbwCbBnen q44fgDATjy20Ado9iblPdow= =mXCk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_commodore.email-scan.com-14383-1100139568-0001-2-- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click