Re: Switch to automake *now*?

Ed Sweetman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.zinf.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Kristian G. Kvilekval wrote:
> Andreas,
> 
>     I was playing with the new build system and got
> the m3u  plugin to work.
> 
> I had to concatenate the definitions in config/config.win32 to
> config/config.h in order to get m3u.cpp to compile.
> 
> How is the rest of conversion process going?
> Should I commit my changes?
> 
> Could you change the default optimization level to -O.
> I have a reasonably stable at that level.
> 
> Thanks.

Am i the only one who gets the feeling of "oh shit" when simply changing 
the way we build zinf seriously alters the way it works when compiled?


if i have time today (which i think i will) i'm going to go through the 
plugins, starting at the audio plugins and make a list of all the 
objects each one touches.  When the list is completed, we should have a 
clear picture of where our problem objects are and we'll be able to 
definitively decide where locks need to go and where they're not needed 
at all.  I'm pretty sure we all know what the problem is..(signals) but 
we cant really say for certain where that problem is and why. 
Hopefully once this mapping of zinf is complete we'll be able to see 
where and why and fix problem objects that access data directly.

I was going to do this anyway for myself in figuring out how to merge my 
fixes to the pipeline into the cvs head, the build issues just increase 
the importance of such a mapping.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? 
You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. 
What are you waiting for?
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.