Re: glibc warnings
"Taj Morton" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.autopackage.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Nov 28, 2007 10:37 AM, Isak Savo <[email protected]> wrote: > By the way, does anyone know of the status on this issue? Is it still > sane to statically link x libs by default? Not really--only *really old* XFree86 systems would still need this, pretty much everything from before 2003ish. Xorg now compiles dynamic copies of libs by default, so I don't think this is really an issue. Maybe we should dynamically link X for now, but leave the option for people to statically link it, in some sort of super-backwards compatibility mode? - Taj -- Taj http://www.wildgardenseed.com/Taj/blog Need a GMail invite? Email me. Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding. -- A. Einstein --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: autopackage-dev-unsubscribe-OfajU3CKLf1/[email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: autopackage-dev-help-OfajU3CKLf1/[email protected]