Re: glibc warnings

2007/11/28, Taj Morton <[email protected]>:
> On Nov 28, 2007 10:37 AM, Isak Savo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > By the way, does anyone know of the status on this issue? Is it still
> > sane to statically link x libs by default?
>
> Not really--only *really old* XFree86 systems would still need this,
> pretty much everything from before 2003ish. Xorg now compiles dynamic
> copies of libs by default, so I don't think this is really an issue.
> Maybe we should dynamically link X for now, but leave the option for
> people to statically link it, in some sort of super-backwards
> compatibility mode?

That's what I was hoping you'd respond! Thanks Taj :-)

I filed http://trac.autopackage.org/ticket/61 and assigned it to you
for now. Feel free to bounce it back if you don't want it.

-Isak

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: autopackage-dev-unsubscribe-OfajU3CKLf1/[email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: autopackage-dev-help-OfajU3CKLf1/[email protected]