Re: Link gtkmm static

Hi,
Does someone have an idea why it doesn't work? I still couldn't solve the
problem :(
Here's my default.apspec again:

[BuildPrepare]
export APBUILD_STATIC="gtkmm-2.4 gdkmm-2.4 atkmm-1.6 pangomm-1.4 cairomm-1.0
glibmm-2.4"
apg++ `pkg-config gtkmm-2.4 --cflags --libs` main.cpp binreloc.o -o
bin/hallowelt
./install.sh $build_root

The binary still depends on libgtkmm-2.4.so.1...
How to use APBUILD_STATIC correctly?

Jan-Nik

On Dec 1, 2007 8:06 PM, Jan Niklas Hasse <[email protected]> wrote:

> Okay maybe i should not do this. Why does it not work anyway?
> Btw: Doesn't Inkscape also links gtkmm statically?
>
> Jan-Nik
>
>
> On Dec 1, 2007 7:41 PM, Isak Savo < [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > 2007/12/1, Jan Niklas Hasse < [email protected]>:
> > > I don't really need this. I'm writing a german tutorial for
> > autopackage and
> > > I wanted to use gtkmm as an example for statically linking and double
> > > compilation. Is gtkmm the wrong library to do this?
> >
> > Depends on your purpose I guess. I don't *think* it needs to be
> > statically linked, given how wide spread it is (and the fact that it
> > is a system library), but if you are doing it for a tutorial style
> > document, then why not..
> >
> > The problem is we don't want to send the wrong signals. If indeed
> > gtkmm does NOT need static linking, then it's kind of weird to have a
> > tutorial that explicitly statically links it. Better then to use
> > something that actually is a problem (some available here:
> > http://trac.autopackage.org/wiki/LibrariesToStaticallyLink, but there
> > are most likely others,)
> >
> > -Isak
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: autopackage-dev-unsubscribe-OfajU3CKLf1/[email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: autopackage-dev-help-OfajU3CKLf1/[email protected]
> >
> >
>