Re: First Autopackage 1.3 patch

> It adds 64 bit support (based on my last patch) and moves nearly all
> scripts out of the .package file. So a 1.3 package doesn't need to be
> executed in order to install it.

Huh? I'll admit I haven't been following autopackage development closely
lately, but executing a package to install it is pretty fundamental. I guess
I don't see what the point of that change is.

> When a package file is installed all scripts are then created using
> the templates. The disadvantage is, that the backend.template and the
> installer.x.template now need to be inside the support code tarball,
> too.

That's a huge design change. Could you quickly write up a rationale for it
please?