Re: First Autopackage 1.3 patch

Ah, OK. Apologies for not reading your patch further. I haven't thought
about it too hard and to be honest, don't really remember the reason that
it's done this way. Probably something to do with the recursive execution of
dependencies. Anyway it sounds like that's a decent enough change. Good luck
with it! :)

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Jan Niklas Hasse <[email protected]> wrote:

> I read your post again and now I understood your point. My mistake was
> that I said it a wrong way from the beginning, here's the corrected
> version:
>
> .package files still need to be executed, but after the support code
> is installed, it takes over control and does thinks like extracting
> the payload and checking the architecture himself.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: autopackage-dev-unsubscribe-OfajU3CKLf1/[email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: autopackage-dev-help-OfajU3CKLf1/[email protected]
>
>