Re: AutoPortage
"Matthew Tedder" <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:53:52 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.autopackage.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Make Hearn, I read the FAQ from top to bottom but couldn't find what you are referring to, unless you are referring to the package hierarchies of distributions and thinking of this as the same kind of thing, possibly? Could you give me just the short on the reasoning behind why you believe such a system can't scale? I could not find any way to search the archives. The link to archives only shows September 2007 and there is no apparent search feature. On the surface, it seems that such a system is necessary to scale and scaling is the primary advantage of it. Currently, the list of autopackages on the autopackage.org site is spotty as per versions and many of them are broken. In any case, hoping each software project ream will maintain an autopackage only scales in theory. It doesn't scale in reality, if they don't do it--which they don't and (unless autopackage becomes the generally preferred method) won't. My idea is to provide a web/RESTful interface to the AutoPortage so it can be maintained by the authors or anyone else willing to take on this responsibility. Like Gentoo's portage, it's just a registry of where to get the sources (of each version of each app) from and a script for compiling and packaging it (as opposed to Gentoo's script for compilign and installing it). Software-wise, I can certainly make this scale.. I can make it decentralized as per servers but centralized as per use. Matthew On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Mike Hearn <[email protected]> wrote: > This idea has come up many times since the project was first created. > The whole point of autopackage is that those sorts of systems don't > scale and tend to be unreliable - this is discussed more in the FAQ. > > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Matthew Tedder <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Has any thought been given to building a system to support maintenance of > > autopackages or is the effort focused on just getting application > developers > > to build autopackages, individually? > > > > I am considering building an "AutoPortage" something like BSD ports or > > Gentoo's Portage. It would be based on a registry of where to download > the > > sources for each version of each application along with a script to make > and > > package. > > > > This would be a server-side tool for efficient maintenance of > autopackages. > > I am still pondering the details, but need to ask if any similar endeavor > is > > already taking place by chance? > > > > Matthew > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: autopackage-dev-unsubscribe-OfajU3CKLf1/[email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: autopackage-dev-help-OfajU3CKLf1/[email protected] > >