Re: luau and 0export
"Thomas Leonard" <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:43:18 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.autopackage.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
2009/1/13 Jan Niklas Hasse <[email protected]>: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Thomas Leonard <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> What are Autopackage's plans for luau? > > I thought of removing luau(-downloader) completely, but haven't suggested > that untill now and also don't know what to replace it with. Maybe > Zeroinstall? I don't know completely what luau actually does though. [...] >> http://0install.net/0export.html >> Create the package: >> >> $ 0export stellarium-setup.sh >> http://0install.net/2006/autopackage/Stellarium.xml >> >> Install and run: >> >> $ ./stellarium-setup.sh > > Not bad, but - no offence - why didn't you use Autopackage? That's a good question. Actually, the interesting thing about 0export isn't that the archives are self-extracting (I just mention this because it's often seen as a difference between the two systems). What actually happens is that the contents of the archive get added to the Zero Install cache, and they're stored in a way that will allow importing the archive with a separate utility in future, checking GPG signatures and digests as you go. That means that, when the program is added this way, you also get the usual other features from Zero Install, e.g. - Notification (via the D-BUS notification system) when new versions are available. - Digital signatures on updates. - Integrity validation (at install time and later using "0store verify", or the newer "0store audit"). - No conflicts (with other Zero Install programs or with distribution packages, etc). - Automatic sharing between users (if enabled by the sysadmin). > As we all have the same goal - easy linux software installation/execution - > what do you think about getting a little bit more together? Maybe even with > the guys from klik. Klik 2 seems to have gone a bit quiet, but if you look at an example of their recipes, you'll see that it's based on the Zero Install format (hint "View Page Source"): http://klik.atekon.de/apt/recipe.xml.php?package=xvier > For example we all need a tool like apgcc, don't we? And > it also would be great to let makepackage automatically create a zeroinstall > feed or let autopackage install packages as klik files or other stuff. Yes, exactly. -- Dr Thomas Leonard ROX desktop / Zero Install GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: autopackage-dev-unsubscribe-OfajU3CKLf1/[email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: autopackage-dev-help-OfajU3CKLf1/[email protected]