Re: luau and 0export

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Jan Niklas Hasse <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Isak Savo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hmm, I don't really understand the need for such tool. Are the
>> developers supposed to provide all three packages at the same time?
>> How is the user supposed to choose which to install?
>
> You're right. Now when I think of it I don't see the need either.
> Isak, do you know what we could replace luau with? Or shouldn't it be
> replaced at all?
>

It was never fully used anyway, at least not by any third party
packagers. I do think that Curtis used it for our packages, although
I'm not sure to what extent.

So there's really no crucial need to replace it for the purpose of
fixing a regression. Although the features it was supposed to provide
(or does provide?) would be nice to have though, so it might be worth
doing if someone has the energy to do it.

Thomas: is this something where autopackage could leverage on the
0install technologies?

-Isak

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: autopackage-dev-unsubscribe-OfajU3CKLf1/[email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: autopackage-dev-help-OfajU3CKLf1/[email protected]