Re: Problems: Stability: 1.4.0
Chris Giles <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:53:09 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.autopackage.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > You're right, it was pretty easy to fix. Thank you so much for finding > this. I don't know why I haven't noticed it. It was caused by using the > wrong variable and I fixed it in revision 2543: > http://trac.autopackage.org/changeset/2543 > Thanks for testing this bug and for making the necessary modification. I think Eugene is right, this is related to #43. > I've added our quotes to the #43 ticket in a new comment. > Ah, I just found out. I missed to add it to the makefile which installs the > development files. Also fixed in r2543. > Thanks for testing this bug and for making the necessary modification. Great! But before you upgrade the code from Qt3 to Qt4 wait till I posted > some news about my plans for Autopackage >=1.5. It contains some major > changes which should make it possible for you to program in python-qt4. I'd like to port the AP-Qt front-end to PyQt4, but it'd require that the end-users have Python and PyQt4 pre-installed. In many cases, this test would fail and the AP-Gtk front-end would be used instead. For now we should concentrate on getting the Qt3 front-end to work. Do you > think it would be okay if we release 1.4.0 without the Qt3 front-end and add > it later on? Yes, I think that's a good idea: wipe out AP-Qt until it's identical to AP-Gtk again. Since I've started teaching and tutoring again, I probably won't have much time to modify AP-Qt right now. > I will build Autopackage again in the next days and fix a last bug I've > found (package can't be found after installing the support code). > Unfortunately I'm in my last year of school and most of the time busy > studying. As a teacher, I must advise you to give priority to your studies :-). We're lucky to have you as an AP developer, and there's no urgency to release v1.4 since v1.2.6 seems to be quite stable.