Autopackage Vs Zero Install
Pablo Garralda <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:33:23 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.autopackage.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--0016e64ea87e5d1e02046fc9fb2c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi everybody,
Reading Autopackage F.A.Q. I've just found a link to "Zero
Install" which it seems to have an approach similar to Autopackage. In its
site, there is a table comparing several options, including Zero install and
Autopackage among others. Of course, According to its page, Zero Install
rocks. ;)
Does anybody know the advantages of Autopackage over Zero
Install? Better portability, perhaps? Or its just a different approach?
Thanks in advance.
Pablo.
--0016e64ea87e5d1e02046fc9fb2c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi everybody,<br>=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Reading Autopackage F.A.Q. =
I've just found a link to "Zero Install" which it seems to ha=
ve an approach similar to Autopackage. In its site, there is a table compar=
ing several options, including Zero install and Autopackage among others. O=
f course, According to its page, Zero Install rocks. ;) <br>
<br>=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Does anybody know the advantages of Auto=
package over Zero Install? Better portability, perhaps? Or its just a diffe=
rent approach?<br><br>Thanks in advance.<br>Pablo.<br>
--0016e64ea87e5d1e02046fc9fb2c--