Re: Bacula 15.0.2 and Baculum 11.0

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.bacula.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thank you, Marcin.  That link 
(https://baculum.app/doc/brief/installation.html#manual-installation) 
led me to the newest Baculum.

BTW, I do use your Bacularis and like it.  It is just that I want both 
especially since I am still fairly new to Bacula and I see no harm in 
having both.

Thanks again.

---


On 8/18/2024 8:12 PM, Marcin Haba wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 03:29, Rob Gerber <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     I hope someone else on this list can shed some light on this.
>     Perhaps Marcin?
> 
> 
>   Hello Everybody,
> 
> Thanks, Rob. Yes, I will try to explain it.
> 
> The latest Baculum release is 15.0.2 released as usual together with 
> Bacula 15.0.2. It can be installed manually following on this install 
> instruction:
> 
> https://baculum.app/doc/brief/installation.html#manual-installation 
> <https://baculum.app/doc/brief/installation.html#manual-installation>
> 
> As you correctly noticed the Baculum repositories with Baculum 11.0 are 
> old and not updated for a long time. I can't provide any sure 
> information about it. It causes that Baculum users need to use manual 
> installation or alternative ways maintained by the Community users. I 
> know that some operating systems provide Baculum packages (Alpine, ALT 
> Linux...) I have also seen the Baculum projects on Docker Hub and some 
> install scripts on GitHub.
> 
> For the question about compatibility Baculum 11 with Bacula 15, 
> unfortunately they are not compatible.
> 
> Best regards,
> Marcin Haba (gani)


_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.