Re: Backing up an external (USB) mounted media on Windows: Incrementals faked?!
Josh Fisher via Bacula-users <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.bacula.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I don't think unmount/remount would change the modification time. However, it might change the mountpoint. Windows uses a multiple-root filesystem. Each drive letter is actually a root path. A remount or reboot could very well result in a USB drive previously mounted as E: to be remounted as D:. When that happens, Bacula will see all of the files as being at a different path than the previous backup, so an incremental will be forced to backup the whole drive. Of course it will. If you unmount/remount a filesystem on Linux to a different path, Bacula will do the same thing. If that is the issue, then it is also possible to mount the USB drive to an empty folder on a NTFS filesystem, rather than a drive letter. This can be done in Computer Management/Disk Management using Select Action > All Tasks > Change Drive Letter and Paths. The USB drive partition does not have to be NTFS, but the folder it is being mounted to does. On 10/14/24 09:07, Marco Gaiarin wrote: >> Backup of external media need some specific setup? > I've changed the subject because was totally misleading; but still i need > some clue... > > > I need to backup an external, USB, disk mounted on a Win10 client; disk > contain 8TB of data, scattered in many files/dirs. I'm using progressive > virtual full, so i'm using 'accurate = yes'. > > I've tried with default fileset options, then with 'accurate = sm' but for > both, sooner or later (i supposed when the client get rebooted; or usb bus > reset and disk get umounted/remounted) i get an incremental backup of the > size of a full (8TB), so simply *ALL* files are considered modified by > bacula. > > > I've tried 'accurate = s5' and incremenetals seems behave right, but an > incremental took more or less a day to complete. Too slow... > > I coud try 'accurate = s' but i think is is unacceptable... too risky... > > > There's some 'knob' to play with? Windows side (eg, prevent to alter/fake > modification time on remount) or bacula side? > > > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users