Re: (My) Job pruning seems not to work as intended
Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.bacula.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <TgsJ6utlRHnQRGl3e4Nl4PVvDobtPOD9yYQVPH2fb61MYm0t_Kz8DN6svWufMEqpgHuDqvxAh6_1s_ibRcomIt-J3g2Zx5Q6Q6fk9CcNC0Y=@protonmail.com> |
On Wednesday, October 16th, 2024 at 06:15, Justin Case <[email protected]> wrote: > I am wondering why I am seeing in my catalog lots of jobs older than the JobRetention defined in the pools, and also older than the default JobRetention assumed for the clients. > The volume recycling seems to work fine adhering to the VolumeRetention in the pools. > > To me it is a mystery, probably be cause I overlook some dependencies I am not aware of. > Can someone please help me understanding this. Hello Justin, From the rest of this thread, it appears that your prunining is working as configured/expected. Where are you seeing the old jobs? bconsole? BWeb? Bacularis? They could be coming from the `jobhisto` table. And you can prove this by querying the `job` and `jobhisto` tables and compare the results. Let us know. Best regards, Bill -- Bill Arlofski [email protected] _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 509 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: ProtonMail wsBzBAEBCAAnBYJnFB2kCZBIDTDab9XDQBYhBMuLnlBaSQiuSUbb6UgNMNpv 1cNAAAB2Cwf9E7hf74PewLjDphOsZr9YSU1P3+tbqlM4SQLnOViKvyzCtsBO 00Wk/QdEqVTqpwFAOIlbTzhXuAEH0jTP7pGrc0/5dnM5lbKwpOdqPKW7xL1A jsdtbb2lsWvDWZnKcW5MntDTgxepjuBMOC+KAGemfbGtqsvmaaN5qI9h169e OYm4lYTxLxP2N90VMpjkRzy66y/FohdR2oy+cAhKx1fGvJ+Ooxot26/qXGYq 2J/0HCayBhqeTF8ewoJ6umvdcM/tOBqhAI/ft2OnLWWCqcqvbJOVROWSnPaI 3SH6oB+b13Hk8A8P4DdlpKz7Q+OKeu/OGSTuHZdKDrURonJ4gcfAqw== =NFEo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----