Re: Performance issue
Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.bacula.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/24/25 10:17 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote: > > Just FYI I am very unconvinced of the benefit of attribute spooling, at > least with a MySQL back-end, because the spooling implementation in > Bacula's MySQL driver is very bad. > > > (It writes attributes into a table to avoid writing them into a table, > then to unspool, it reads them all out of that table and writes them > into the table it otherwise would have written them to in the first > place. Um ...... yeah. Quite aside from the obvious performance > implications, Hello Phil, I will let a developer comment on this as it is "Above my pay grade"™, but I can say that I have seen horrific backup performance with attribute spooling disabled. It has been very many years since I last even tried, but apparently it is not (was not?) very efficient to write the attributes of each file to the catalog in real time as the backup is running. > this huge atomic write *also* makes it incompatible with Galera 3 clusters.) This is interesting and useful news to me because we have prospects recently coming to us asking about Galera clusters. Thank you. :) Best regards, Bill -- Bill Arlofski [email protected] _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 509 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: ProtonMail wsBzBAEBCAAnBQJnk9puCRBIDTDab9XDQBYhBMuLnlBaSQiuSUbb6UgNMNpv 1cNAAAAGCwf9FEwUHs9Tn5ruVL6BMzjUDgxW9FIj+VOM9tZfidJUQqiPeiLD yjMd1DV9PXHFvI9KkP8ENTqVEqgRZu+AvT2YWkNBbGjxTQP7O+M4nk4gNBGi RjOUwtrp8+/SnbGwQz9G0IAspuRk1S1nca0M5IS/0nyyn+hAsjrMeNn+DHgG 9RNR9VB550drm5umQuJNO1DJgswXzRpwwco9JcEguOzXTF8kKAFZNXES8cve 5uO7qrrKY4TFayms3y7RX/YOs+PfLbSrrZMdbDluBtuOMFiuPibumCKTuzDQ GPdfskMLKGaOfR8VhMsywIVamAhvAaBDhQ44QgDnskaHaNJq4BZXQw== =xNR0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----