Re: [OT?] Enable hardware encryption on RDX...

Marco Gaiarin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.bacula.user
Organization Il gaio usa sempre TIN per le liste, fallo anche tu!!!
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Mandi! Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users
  In chel di` si favelave...

> Why not just use the simple to manage Bacula Storage Daemon Encryption feature?

Because, at least for tapes, this practically brake hardware compression; so
if i enable software encryption i need also to enable software compression,
and this add some more slowdown.

I've done some tests in my production environment in this weeks, so real
data, and:

 + software encryption add 5-20% to backup time
 + software encryption add 10-25% to backup space
 + software compression not tested
 + media-based, not client-based; it is a pros-and-coons thinks, i know, but
   seems to me a beter approach.

hardware encryption (and compression) is really and totally transparent to
backup, eg a backup done with hardware encryption enabled take same time and
space of an hardware encryption disabled backup.


For RDX there's no hardware compression, so software encryption effectively
could be a decent approach; but seems supported also there, so i'll give it a
try...

--
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.