bacula-fd Instances Timing Out on `status client`, despite Running Jobs

Lloyd Brown <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.bacula.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi all,

I'm running into an issue with some bacula-fd instances and hoping 
someone can point me in the right direction.

In short: I have bacula-fd instances that are clearly running jobs 
(confirmed via strace), but they often time out when I run status 
client=CLIENTNAME. They only seem reliably responsive when idle.

Details:

   *     Bacula version: 9.6.6 (yes, I know it's old — upgrade is planned).
   *     Setup: Two hosts (`zhomebackup[1-2]`) running both SD and FD. A
    script at the beginning of each job snapshots NFS shares, mounts
    them, and outputs file paths for backups.
   *     Problem: These hosts struggle to handle more than 6–7 jobs
    effectively. Going beyond that causes a drop in aggregate file scan
    rates.
   *     Attempted solution: Spun up additional FD instances on separate
    ports (originally inside Docker, but now just running natively on
    non-standard ports). These new instances are /intermittently/
    responsive to `status client`, even with only 1–3 jobs. The original
    FD (on the default port) remains responsive, even with 6–7 jobs.

I'm wondering if this could be a shared resource issue or some FD 
limitation I'm not accounting for. Or is there a better way to scale job 
throughput?

I've attached a tarball containing systemd service files, FD configs, 
and relevant parts of the Director config, including an example job 
definition.

Any insights would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Lloyd

-- 
Lloyd Brown
HPC Systems Administrator
Office of Research Computing
Brigham Young University
http://rc.byu.edu

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
bacula_diag.tar.gz (application/gzip, 2 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.