Re: 'Lock' retention on a media...
Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.bacula.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/4/25 9:06 AM, Rob Gerber wrote: > > *I think the migrated jobs should inherit the new pool's retention period.* Hello Rob, everyone... The above statement from Rob is 100% correct. As a matter of fact, this is the general idea and typical use case... eg: We see people run backup jobs to disk using Pools with low(ish) volume retention periods (for fast, local restores when needed), then they run Copy or Migration jobs to tape or cloud using pools with much longer volume retention periods. Hope this helps, Bill -- Bill Arlofski [email protected] _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 583 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: ProtonMail wsCpBAEBCABdBYJoQGcuCZBIDTDab9XDQDUUAAAAAAAcABBzYWx0QG5vdGF0 aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwanMub3Jn1AEwn8VfbP7JNSzOpi1xKRYhBMuLnlBaSQiu SUbb6UgNMNpv1cNAAADIDQf+KjwYHmBiUyHnXemgWSF1iKT9A0lXVs+JWQ8c 9fh03sB97SN9gDYJ06pCO+qcMFFWTp0IRxMkMyiyTTMRguhCVCbXD7Kt7mjl qcMB0eMSydyZbSiSeTy1rnNKJScBOpDB2V1RIxD7xBj1cG3Brit5kR+9ZAEX n8NLVQ3f+N+o5tcrEoWvrYACXadkUFmgdBrGOnyDtnMC1G0lF5FZg3YqQGMm nkUA7k8r6fSIB5SiTY/ahsyLD6WYoBJPwHn45wT1wBMv3+4TZUNsvU7m9Jv9 HrZljWnfEZ6cJlQy/84Nw/LBJtlJnU5Fk+MSJ4txOPAPFYeguVZ1SVyL4B8d Y0DV+A== =zDcX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----