Re: Poor network backup performance
Josh Fisher via Bacula-users <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.bacula.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In both the FD and SD config files, set Maximum Network Buffer Size = 32768. The default size of 64k is known to cause this issue in Windows, or at least certain versions of Windows using certain NICs. You will need to restart bacula-sd on the server and bacula-fd on the Windows PC before testing. On 11/21/25 09:55, Phil Pemberton via Bacula-users wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been using Bacula to back up my NAS for some time, and it's been > working well. I see effective backup rates of about 30MB/s all told > (100MB+ unspooling from SSD to tape, maxing out the LTO6 drive). > > Unfortunately when I added my desktop PC to the backup cycle, I found > that the effective rate dropped like a rock, to single-digit megabytes > per seconds. > > The machines are both fairly fast -- the desktop machine (backup > source running the FD) is a Ryzen 5 5600X, and the server (with the > SAS SSD and tape drive) is an Intel Core i5-9400. > The network is gigabit end-to-end, and the transfer rates I'm seeing > are very poor. Other applications taking the same path are much faster. > > Both systems are running Debian derivatives -- the desktop runs Mint > with Bacula 13.0.4, and the server runs Ubuntu 24.04 with the same > version of Bacula. > > Is there anything I can do to improve performance backing up over the > network, before I resort to a nightly Rsync from the workstation to > the server and backing up from there? > > Thanks. _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users