RE: Curriculm
"Ward, Nigel" <[email protected]> Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:13:33 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.belts.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <B9810FC71AA0924AADF61019A51808271C2492@scurrex2.curriculum.edu.au> |
> For any CO (Curriculum Organizer) data set there are between=20 > 100 and 1000 > learning outcomes. Given this I don't believe that it's not practical > evaluate each LO (Learning Object) on the fly which means=20 > that it needs to > be done before the search is run.=20 Just want to clarify what you are saying ... In the current design, learning outcomes are not displayed within search = results. Instead, a link to "related outcomes" appears in the brief = metadata for each search result. The related learning outcomes for the = learning object could be calculated when this link is clicked. Are you suggesting that the cost of calculating matching learning = outcomes when this link is clicked is too high, and therefore they = should be pre-calculated for each learning object? If pre-calculation is required, then I think calculation has too happen A) When a learning object (version) is loaded B) When the curriculum organiser is changed (A) involves a calculation for just new learning objects (and versions). (B) involves a re-calculation for every learning object. Presumably = this could take a while if there are a large number of objects. Nigel Ward The Learning Federation Casselden Place, Level 5, 2 Lonsdale St, Melbourne 3000 email: [email protected] phone: 03 9657 9740 mobile: 0414 234 040 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en