RE: Curriculm

"Ward, Nigel" <[email protected]> Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:13:33 +1000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.belts.devel
Message-ID <B9810FC71AA0924AADF61019A51808271C2492@scurrex2.curriculum.edu.au>
> For any CO (Curriculum Organizer) data set there are between=20
> 100 and 1000
> learning outcomes. Given this I don't believe that it's not practical
> evaluate each LO (Learning Object) on the fly which means=20
> that it needs to
> be done before the search is run.=20

Just want to clarify what you are saying ...

In the current design, learning outcomes are not displayed within search =
results.  Instead, a link to "related outcomes" appears in the brief =
metadata for each search result.  The related learning outcomes for the =
learning object could be calculated when this link is clicked.

Are you suggesting that the cost of calculating matching learning =
outcomes when this link is clicked is too high, and therefore they =
should be pre-calculated for each learning object?

If pre-calculation is required, then I think calculation has too happen
A) When a learning object (version) is loaded
B) When the curriculum organiser is changed

(A) involves a calculation for just new learning objects (and versions).
(B) involves a re-calculation for every learning object.  Presumably =
this could take a while if there are a large number of objects.

Nigel Ward
The Learning Federation
Casselden Place, Level 5, 2 Lonsdale St, Melbourne 3000
email: [email protected]
phone: 03 9657 9740
mobile: 0414 234 040


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en