Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] spl: ufs: add Falcon mode load path
Simon Glass <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 07:02:36 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFLszTh0F-GsKVKuEVJ2NjEjjm+KOg375oV8+OwbUu1DBrAMZw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Alexey, On 2026-07-31T17:10:44, Alexey Charkov <[email protected]> wrote: > spl: ufs: add Falcon mode load path > > In Falcon mode, the SPL loads a FIT image containing a Linux kernel > instead of U-boot proper, and it may need to fall back to loading U-boot > if Linux is unavailable. > > Add support for images containing a Linux kernel, optionally on a > different UFS LUN and/or offset vs. U-boot proper to enable fallback. > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Charkov <[email protected]> > > common/spl/Kconfig | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++ > common/spl/spl_ufs.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > In Falcon mode, the SPL loads a FIT image containing a Linux kernel > instead of U-boot proper, and it may need to fall back to loading U-boot > if Linux is unavailable. Please spell it 'U-Boot' (both occurrences). Since this patch actually accepts TF-A and TEE payloads too, please mention that here - the current wording suggests only a Linux kernel is expected. > diff --git a/common/spl/spl_ufs.c b/common/spl/spl_ufs.c > @@ -20,13 +20,38 @@ static ulong spl_ufs_load_read(struct spl_load_info *load, ulong off, ulong size > + if (spl_image->os != IH_OS_LINUX && spl_image->os != IH_OS_TEE && > + spl_image->os != IH_OS_ARM_TRUSTED_FIRMWARE) { > + puts("Expected OS image is not found\n"); > + return -ENOENT; > + } The equivalent check in mmc_load_image_raw_os() only accepts LINUX and TEE - the ARM_TRUSTED_FIRMWARE addition is new and specific to this series. Please mention that in the commit message so it is not mistaken for a copy/paste divergence, and consider whether the mmc/nand/spi paths should have the same relaxation in a follow-up. > diff --git a/common/spl/spl_ufs.c b/common/spl/spl_ufs.c > @@ -20,13 +20,38 @@ static ulong spl_ufs_load_read(struct spl_load_info *load, ulong off, ulong size > +static int spl_ufs_load_image_raw_os(struct spl_image_info *spl_image, > + struct spl_boot_device *bootdev, > + struct spl_load_info *load, > + struct blk_desc *bd) > +{ > + ulong sector = config_opt_enabled(CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT, > + CONFIG_SPL_UFS_RAW_OS_SECTOR, > + CONFIG_SPL_UFS_RAW_U_BOOT_SECTOR); bd here is just load->priv - please drop the extra parameter and fetch log2blksz from load->priv, matching how spl_ufs_load_read() already does it. Also, config_opt_enabled() is redundant: this helper is only reachable from the OS_BOOT branch below, so CONFIG_SPL_UFS_RAW_OS_SECTOR is always defined - just use it directly. > diff --git a/common/spl/spl_ufs.c b/common/spl/spl_ufs.c > @@ -36,6 +61,35 @@ static int spl_ufs_load_image(struct spl_image_info *spl_image, > + if (os_devnum == devnum) { > + os_bd = bd; > + os_load = load; > + } else { The struct copy of load into os_load is unusual - spl_load_info is meant to be initialised through spl_load_init(). Since the two branches only diverge when the device differs, please just pass &load, bd to the helper in the equal case and drop os_load entirely; only the != branch needs a second spl_load_info. > diff --git a/common/spl/spl_ufs.c b/common/spl/spl_ufs.c > @@ -36,6 +61,35 @@ static int spl_ufs_load_image(struct spl_image_info *spl_image, > + puts("spl_ufs_load_image: Failed to load falcon payload\n"); > + log_debug("(error=%d)\n", err); > + if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OS_BOOT_SECURE)) > + return err; > + } > + > +load_uboot: The other backends (spl_mmc, spl_nor, ...) print 'Fallback to U-Boot' before dropping through - please do the same here for consistency, otherwise the boot log just shows the failure with no indication that fallback is happening. Regards, Simon