Re: [v2, 00/10] spl: Add support for Falcon mode with ARM Trusted Firmware

Hi Alexey,

On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 at 08:47, Alexey Charkov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 5:05=E2=80=AFPM Simon Glass <[email protected]> wro=
te:
> >
> > Hi Alexey,
> >
> > On 2026-07-31T17:10:44, Alexey Charkov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > binman: tests: Add test coverage for a FIT with embedded Linux+initrd=
 and /chosen
> > ...
> >
> > > This has been tested with an uncompressed ARM64 Image as the payload,=
 as
> > > well as with a GZip-compressed one (using existing SPL_GZIP functiona=
lity)
> >
> > Just to check - is there any test coverage for the SPL side (the
> > atf/UFS/Falcon-decision changes in patches 1-3), or is that all
> > board-level? A sandbox_spl test for the caching behaviour in patch 1
> > would be nice if feasible, since that is generic code.
>
> Oof. I'll need to check what the sandbox SPL implementation can do.
> The whole Falcon thing is quite SoC specific. Let me give it a try.

The sandbox_spl tests are fairly limited but there is test_vbe_vpl.py
and also test_handoff.py - it's not critcal as we have lived without
coverage for a while, but it would be great if you can figure it out.

Regards,
Simon