Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] x86: qemu: Wire support for applying EFI capsule updates to pflash
Simon Glass <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot.general,gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFLszTiW0cFyRkeLRAw9k3sP_TpPqO-Qu1PvH+fmi67qOmVK8Q@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Elliot, On 2026-08-07T18:07:09, Elliot Berman <[email protected]> wrote: > x86: qemu: Wire support for applying EFI capsule updates to pflash > > Add new UUIDs for QEMU x86/x86-64 EFI capsules and register them with > update_info. Enable the config options to bind the pflash with dfu, > expecting to follow the typical convention of the first bank (nor0) > containing u-boot. > > Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <[email protected]> > > board/emulation/common/Kconfig | 2 ++ > board/emulation/common/qemu_dfu.c | 16 ++++----------- > board/emulation/common/qemu_mtdparts.c | 36 +++++++++++++++------------------ > board/emulation/qemu-x86/Kconfig | 3 +++ > board/emulation/qemu-x86/Makefile | 3 +++ > board/emulation/qemu-x86/qemu-x86.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 6 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) > diff --git a/board/emulation/common/qemu_mtdparts.c b/board/emulation/common/qemu_mtdparts.c > @@ -50,28 +50,24 @@ void board_mtdparts_default(const char **mtdids, const char **mtdparts) > - /* Currently mtdparts is needed on Qemu ARM64 for capsule updates */ > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_CAPSULE_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT) && > - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TARGET_QEMU_ARM_64BIT)) { Just to check the knock-on effect of dropping the target check: qemu-arm-sbsa also builds this file (it implies SYS_MTDPARTS_RUNTIME and sources the common Kconfig), so it now looks for nor0 too, and MTDPARTS_NOR0 has no default there so it resolves to an empty string. I suspect this is harmless today, since sbsa does not enable FLASH_CFI_MTD so no nor0 MTD device is registered, but if that changes the result would be a malformed 'mtdparts=nor0:' - perhaps board_get_mtdparts() should skip a device whose partition string is empty. Fine as a follow-up if you agree it is latent. Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]> Regards, Simon