Re: [PATCH v3] fdt: Fix phandles not copying when using templates

Anshul Dalal <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot.general,gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed Jul 29, 2026 at 4:12 PM IST, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> Hi Anshul,
>
> On 7/29/26 12:24 PM, Anshul Dalal wrote:
>> The phandles used inside a template are not copied to the node inserting
>> the template, leading to a missing phandle error.
>> 
>> The following example can be used to reproduce the issue:
>> 
>> &binman {
>>    some_template: template-0 {
>>      ti-secure-rom {
>>        content = <&some_data>;
>>        keyfile = "some_key";
>>      };
>>      some_data: blob-ext {
>>        optional;
>>      };
>>    };
>>    output-bin {
>>      insert-template = <&some_template>;
>>    };
>> };
>> 
>
> What happens if you insert the template *twice*.
>
> e.g. have:
>
>   &binman {
>      some_template: template-0 {
>        ti-secure-rom {
>          content = <&some_data>;
>          keyfile = "some_key";
>        };
>        some_data: blob-ext {
>          optional;
>        };
>      };
>      output-bin {
>        insert-template = <&some_template>;
>      };
>      output-bin2 {
>        insert-template = <&some_template>;
>      };
>   };
>
> ? Gut feeling is that this will fail to build because we now have the 
> same label for two different nodes.

Yes, it will cause a failure due to duplicated phandles. And as per the
docs[1], it seems to be an expected qwirk of how templates work.

[1]: https://docs.u-boot.org/en/v2026.04/develop/package/binman.html#dealing-with-phandles

Regards,
Anshul
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.