Re: [0/5] binman: add nxp_imx93cst etype for i.MX93 flash.bin signing

Hi Jérémie,

On 2026-08-14T17:07:09, Jérémie Dautheribes
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Patch 1: introduces the new etype
> Patch 2: updates the imx93-u-boot.dtsi description to include the new
> signing nodes
> Patches 3-4: documentation
> Patch 5: adds test coverage
[..]
> The implementation is largely derived from the existing i.MX8M support,
> since the two share much of the same signing infrastructure.

Given how close this is to nxp_imx8mcst, please say in the cover
letter whether you considered factoring out a common base class rather
than duplicating the etype, and why you decided against it.

Regards,
Simon