Re: [PATCH v2] usb: gadget: f_mass_storage: Move schedule() in sleep_thread()
Patrice CHOTARD <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot.general,gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/16/26 21:03, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 8/6/26 9:27 AM, Patrice CHOTARD wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/6/26 02:33, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 8/5/26 9:30 AM, Patrice CHOTARD wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Patrice,
>>>
>>>>> Agree with your analysis, i will send a fix to exit from cyclic_run() in case the next cyclic timestamp is not reached.
>>>>> But, in parallel, to gain more reactivity, schedule() can also be moved at the same level of ctrcl() as this patch is proposing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Patrice
>>>>>
>>>> Hi Marek
>>>>
>>>> Is it OK for you to merge this patch ?
>>> Is this series still necessary with the cyclic fixes in place ?
>>
>> Yes it allows to get an additional reactivity gain.
>>
>> With the cyclic fixes 9c1b13b3fd27 ("cyclic: reduce get_timer_us() calls inside hlist_for_each_entry_safe()")
>> ctrlc() is called every ~280ms
>>
>> With this patch, ctrlc() is called every ~70ms.
> Is there any chance we can optimize the schedule() call further instead?
Hi Marek
Yes, It's possible to optimize schedule() call.
Since commit 4b6a3e860878 ("usb: gadget: f_mass_storage: Add schedule() in sleep_thread()")
schedule is called on every for() loop iteration.
Schedule() can be called only if needed, ie if g_dnl_board_usb_cable_connected() is not overloaded.
I well send a patch for this.
Patrice