Re: A newbie question
jon klein <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.breve |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jun 5, 2004, at 11:06 AM, dan bornside wrote: > This might be a bit hopeful. If you are fully divorcing the breve > code from the > steve code, might one hope that a steve engine might be available for > use without > breve, such as an embeddable steve interpreter, or a steve shell? > > There are some things about steve (and objective-c) that i don't like, > but its > easily a very superior object oriented interpreted language. It's > very terse, > while being very expressive, and well designed for object oriented > tasks. It > could, for instance, be very useful interfacing with a rdbs. This should definitely be doable. I'll try to put together a simple example of this for the next release as well. If there are things about steve that you don't like, now would be the time to bring them up. Since the next breve release will likely be "2.0", now is probably the time to make changes to the language. - jon klein _______________________________________________ breve mailing list [email protected] http://www.spiderland.org/mailman/listinfo/breve