RE: scheduling order

"Marcin Pilat" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.breve
Message-ID <000001c3c40c$40702990$6401a8c0@dabear>
Thanks for the reply.
Attached is a sample file to demonstrate this.
There is 3 commented lines ABC - use only one at a time.

If you uncomment line #A the behaviour is a direct call and order is
preserved (top to bottom coloring).

If you uncomment line #B the bahaviour is also preserved - this is my
own scheduling using the init method and a timer.

If you uncomment line #C the behaviour is not preserved - this is the
scheduler.

Marcin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of jon klein
> Sent: December 16, 2003 12:04 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [breve] scheduling order
> 
> 
> On Dec 16, 2003, at 1:20 PM, Marcin Pilat wrote:
> 
> > Direct call:
> >
> > If RunMeFirst directly calls the RunMe method, then obviously the
> > evaluation order of the objects' RunMe method is preserved based on
> > the RunMeFirst method.
> >
> > Schedule call:
> >
> > If RunMeFirst calls the scheduler to schedule the RunMe method after
a
> > fixed time (eg. 1) then the evaluation order of RunMe is independent
> > on the evaluation order of RunMeFirst.
> 
> I'm not sure that I fully understand the problem you're having, but I
> think what you're describing is the expected behavior.  I also see how
> it could be problematic.
> 
> In general, the execution order of things scheduled for the same time
> by the breve engine is undefined.  So if you have two objects
> scheduling a method call for the same time, you can't rely on one
being
> called before the other.  This applies to other methods the engine
> calls as well, such as the "iterate" method.
> 
> When execution order is important, generally the best thing to do is
> call the methods explicitly from another object which will manage the
> execution (for example, the Controller object might be used).  So
> instead of scheduling  RunMe for both of the objects, you would
> schedule a call for the manager object, which will in turn call the
> RunMe method for both objects.
> 
> That said, I see how it could become tedious--it should be relatively
> straightforward to change the order of the scheduled method calls in
> breve, so I'll look into that.
> 
> - jon klein
> 
> _______________________________________________
> breve mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.spiderland.org/mailman/listinfo/breve

_______________________________________________
breve mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spiderland.org/mailman/listinfo/breve
sched-order-test.tz (application/octet-stream, 2.7 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.