[Bug #82] [Base] error accessing bug

http://anthill.vmlinuz.ca/anthill/query.php?bug=82

--- 82	2003-10-03 06:07:03.000000000 -0600
+++ 82.tmp.6Px1KB	2003-10-03 09:42:02.000000000 -0600
@@ -64,3 +64,23 @@



+Comment posted: 2003-10-03 09:42 AM by [email protected]
+
+No... my point is this doesn't have anything to do with anthill.  This is controlled via php's maximum
+execution time.  How  the administrator handles this is up to them.  And, FYI, using anthill for 3 years for
+secteam we've never once run into this problem before... I guess we're more terse.  =)
+
+Regardless, I can happily make it so that inline links aren't made clickable... that would solve the problem
+right there.  But I think that's a step backwards...  but, hey, look at it this way.  I don't belive there is a timeout
+with mod_perl which is why it can take you 3 minutes to see anything on bugzilla.  I'd say a 60s timeout isn't
+too bad in comparison.  I could remove constraints entirely and put it on par with bugzilla... then you could
+take 3 minutes to load a 500k page also.  Would that make it better?
+
+Anyways, keep in mind that Anthill was not written for the MandrakeSoft bug tracking system, so while
+annotated logs may be desirable for some, it might not be desirable for others.  Anthill wasn't designed to
+encourage or discourage anything... if we want big log files, then the admin has to compensate for it, which
+I did.
+
+Which is also why this bug has absolutely nothing valid to do with Anthill other than I'd like to be able to
+speed up the page processing function.  But that doesn't make it a bug either.
+

----
You are receiving this notice because you are the assignee, reporter, or a
watcher for this bug report.

_______________________________________________
Anthill-workers mailing list
Anthill-workers-+mQDA36h6dWw5LPnMra/[email protected]
http://vmlinuz.ca/mailman/listinfo/anthill-workers