[Bug #91] [Base] Hardcoded include paths

anthill-daemon <anthill-daemon-+mQDA36h6dWw5LPnMra/[email protected]> Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:13:59 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.bug-tracking.anthill.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
http://anthill.vmlinuz.ca/anthill/query.php?bug=91

--- 91	2004-01-14 23:13:58.000000000 -0700
+++ 91.tmp.NotGOG	2004-01-14 23:13:58.000000000 -0700
@@ -67,3 +67,14 @@

 Isn't that sufficient?

+Comment posted: 2004-01-14 11:13 PM by turbo-lqJR/[email protected]
+
+Sorry. With hardcoded paths I mean relative paths. The fix I showed isn't correct either,
+but that was the fastest one.
+
+The idea is to use RELATIVE paths (../xxx and ./xxx etc).
+
+And I have multiple instances on the same virtual host (SSL can't HAVE virtual hosts!).
+Using relative paths in the application, and coding it this way will remove the need for
+include_path.
+

----
You are receiving this notice because you are the assignee, reporter, or a
watcher for this bug report.

_______________________________________________
Anthill-workers mailing list
Anthill-workers-+mQDA36h6dWw5LPnMra/[email protected]
http://vmlinuz.ca/mailman/listinfo/anthill-workers