[Bug #104] [Base] Separate databases for products

anthill-daemon <anthill-daemon-+mQDA36h6dWw5LPnMra/[email protected]> Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:37:45 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.bug-tracking.anthill.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
http://anthill.vmlinuz.ca/anthill/query.php?bug=104

--- 104	2004-02-20 09:37:45.000000000 -0700
+++ 104.tmp.tdlraN	2004-02-20 09:37:45.000000000 -0700
@@ -47,3 +47,18 @@
 default leave the state of numbering all bugs together irregardless of the
 product?

+Comment posted: 2004-02-20 09:37 AM by [email protected]
+
+No, I don't think this is a good idea.  Bug numbers need to remain unique to
+the system... changing this would involve a lot of work.  Making it a preference
+would be even more work, and I see very little gain for this.  There are a
+number of things in the system that would need to be re-worked in order to
+make this feasible, whether it was a preference or not.
+
+Now, that's not to say it cannot be done.  I gladly accept patches that work
+well, or you can fund the development for this.  Without funding or a patch
+that cleanly applies to CVS and doesn't break the rest of the system, I'm afraid
+it won't be done.
+
+I leave it up to you to determine how important this is for your company.
+

----
You are receiving this notice because you are the assignee, reporter, or a
watcher for this bug report.

_______________________________________________
Anthill-workers mailing list
Anthill-workers-+mQDA36h6dWw5LPnMra/[email protected]
http://vmlinuz.ca/mailman/listinfo/anthill-workers