Re: How we use Git, part 2

On 25/11/14 14:22, David Lawrence wrote:
> Sounds fine to me. I would even go a little further and name it bug-218917-gerv or
> feature-218917-gerv. For people who want to contribute that do not have checkin
> rights, there is always github as well and they can use similar naming there.

When would you choose "bug" and when "feature"? How is expressing that
distinction in the branch name useful? Or do you just think it reads better?

Gerv
-
To view or change your list settings, click here:
<http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=gcbd-developers-Uylq5CNFT+jYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>