Remove approval requirement for trunk?
Gervase Markham <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:33:43 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.bug-tracking.bugzilla.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'd like to propose we remove the approval requirement for trunk. LpSolit said the last time he can remember anyone a-minusing a patch for trunk was where the feature wasn't actually wanted, and no-one had bothered to point this out, and it was quite a few years ago. If we instead had some sort of last resort "the project lead can request a backout of a trunk feature if he decides it's not actually wanted" power, and expect that power to be used about once every 5 years, would that be enough to eliminate this extra bureaucratic step? The one exception, I suggest, would be for patches which touch the DB, which can not be so easily backed out. Those would continue to require approval from an approver. Approval would also remain in place for stable branches, where approvers are supposed to weigh the importance of the patch against the risk to stability. What do you all think? Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-apps-bugzilla mailing list dev-apps-bugzilla-CzyLcWPZiU5YsZ3hbOqMTti2O/[email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-bugzilla - To view or change your list settings, click here: <http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=gcbd-developers-Uylq5CNFT+jYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>