Re: Have a separate Bugzilla installation for the Bugzilla project?

Makes quite some sense to me.

Jochen

On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Frédéric Buclin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Seeing how things are going in the Mozilla world, I would suggest that
> the Bugzilla project has its own Bugzilla installation, managed by the
> upstream Bugzilla team itself. More and more users do not understand
> that BMO != upstream Bugzilla, and having their own installation running
> unmodified current tip code (currently 5.1) would help 1) users to
> discover newly implemented features, and 2) developers to find regressions.
>
> BMO UI and backend code differ more and more from upstream Bugzilla;
> some features which exist upstream are being removed from BMO, such as
> personal tags, see bug 1227316; many bugs reported by Mozilla users are
> specific to BMO and do not affect upstream. So IMO it makes sense to
> close the Bugzilla product in BMO and manage upstream bugs in their own
> Bugzilla installation instead.
>
> What do you think? Ignore import/export of existing bugs for now. This
> is not the most critical part.
>
> Myk filed a bug about this migration a long time ago, see
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127876.
>
>
> LpSolit
>
> -
> To view or change your list settings, click here:
> <http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=jochen.wiedmann-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>



-- 
The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"

http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg
-
To view or change your list settings, click here:
<http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=gcbd-developers-Uylq5CNFT+jYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>