Re: Have a separate Bugzilla installation for the Bugzilla project?

In the grand scheme of things, the Bugzilla project is pretty small.  I
highly doubt we'd need anything more than a dual core server with 8GB of
RAM or so. (Maybe less RAM, depends on how bad mod_perl kills it, but
mod_perl is RAM-hungry).  Bugzilla.mozilla.org is a many-headed beast
because of Firefox and friends. :-)  Having the DB on a separate box
from the webserver may be good for performance.

Denis Roy wrote:
> If there's consensus, then I'd appreciate knowing what the project team
> needs to run.
> 
> We use SuSE Linux Entreprise 12 which has everything needed to run a
> Bugzilla instance.  Aside from the obvious Perl, MariaDB and other
> related bits, what is needed in terms of hardware specs?
> 
> Denis
> 
> 
> On 30/11/15 11:41 AM, Dave Miller wrote:
>> Gervase Markham wrote:
>>> On 29/11/15 14:33, Frédéric Buclin wrote:
>>>> I would suggest that
>>>> the Bugzilla project has its own Bugzilla installation, managed by the
>>>> upstream Bugzilla team itself.
>>> I agree that now is the time for this, particularly given the very
>>> generous offer from Denis and the Eclipse team.
>> I agree as well.  I was going to say that we probably ought to wait for
>> BMO to finish their current upstream merge and see where that puts us,
>> but I think the Eclipse offer gives us a pretty good excuse to do it
>> anyway :)  We have actually wanted it for a while, everyone's just
>> scared of the work involved in migrating.
>>
> 
> -
> To view or change your list settings, click here:
> <http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/[email protected]>

-- 
Dave Miller http://www.justdave.net/
IT Infrastructure Engineer, Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/
Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System http://www.bugzilla.org/

-
To view or change your list settings, click here:
<http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=gcbd-developers-Uylq5CNFT+jYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>