Re: PAM Authentication Patch

Chad Walstrom <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.bug-tracking.gnats.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Chad Walstrom wrote:
> We should make it abundantly clear in the documentation that use of
> PAM authentication should be thoroughly protected.  If such measures
> cannot be taken, don't enable PAM.

Additionally, we can't always assume that because something uses PAM,
it'll authentication against system accounts.  There are dbm modules,
ldap modules, etc. that can be used for account management.

-- 
Chad Walstrom <[email protected]>           http://www.wookimus.net/
           assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */

_______________________________________________
Help-gnats mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnats
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA1dBYDMcLGCBsWv0RAi2uAKDLJBVUlScg4oregdlrJXTtt9aL0QCeNoYu
T08tAJAKs/x9KSzcrUWBLCk=
=nnwu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.