Re: PAM Authentication Patch

Chad Walstrom <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.bug-tracking.gnats.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Pankaj K Garg wrote:
> I'm attaching a patch for enabling PAM authentication support.
...
> I've done some preliminary testing on my RH 9.0 Linux. Please let me
> know if there's any problem with it.

Thanks for the patch!  I'll try to test this out later this week.  If
anyone else would like to do some testing, it would be appreciated.

We can continue this discussion about security and gnatsd.  I'll add a
Security Enhancement in the TODO list for 5.x releases.  We can decide
whether or not we want to hold off on the PAM addition until TLS and/or
SASL is introduced with TLS being of higher priority than SASL.  I vote
to allow it, but document the warnings and possible solutions regarding
security.

Feedback, ideas, rebuttals?

-- 
Chad Walstrom <[email protected]>           http://www.wookimus.net/
           assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */

_______________________________________________
Help-gnats mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnats
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFA1v4fDMcLGCBsWv0RAnMYAKCy//zR27DKH0vZ9sHeHpglHSf9KgCY+Oes
sNa8OP2rwRc3ihSxyP5Hcg==
=HLqe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.