Re: CustomFieldGroupings

Emmanuel Lacour <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.bug-tracking.request-tracker.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 08:34:29AM +0100, Christian Loos wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> is it really intended that CustomFieldGroupings don't respect the CF
> name case [1]?
> 
> Example:
> * create CF "name"
> * create CF "NAME"
> * put this in RT_Site_Config.pm:
> Set(%CustomFieldGroupings, 'RT::Ticket' => [ 'Test' => ['name'] ]);
> 
> The result is that both CF's appear in the "Test" grouping, which is
> maybe not what the admin wanted.
> 
> I think it isn't the best way to use the CF name as identifier for
> CustomFieldGroupings. Except the above example, it is currently not
> possible to have two CF's with the same name and put only one of them in
> a CustomFieldGrouping.
> 
> A better way would be to use the CF id as the identifier.
> 


who is going to like using numerical identifiers in configuration?

better to:

- fix the query to be case sensitive (even I don't think many people
  use multiple CF with only case changes within the same queue). It's a
  bug imho.
- allow to do per queue grouping (this is a must have, a ticket is
  already open for this)

-- 
Easter-eggs                              Spécialiste GNU/Linux
44-46 rue de l'Ouest  -  75014 Paris  -  France -  Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37    -   Fax: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 76
mailto:[email protected]  -   http://www.easter-eggs.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.