Re: RT::Extension::ExternalStorage
Alex Vandiver <[email protected]> Sun, 6 Sep 2015 15:20:14 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.bug-tracking.request-tracker.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:27:04AM +0200, Emmanuel Manganneau wrote: > This, plus the 2nd question, leaded me to create a new object > (called Document) which represents files. The files are linked to > other classical objects in RT via Link objects (type "AttachedTo" or > "AttachedBy"). This sounds like a purely backend changes, yes? But it's not clear to me what problem you are attempting to solve by doing this. While unifying the OCFV and Attachment data storage is a perhaps-useful goal, I don't see much actual gain from it -- it will increase the size of the Links table by orders of magnitude. I also don't understand how this would avoid having to load the file data into memory when saving or loading (your point 2). - Alex