Re: Gmail website replies to tickets, Outlook creates new ones

Nilesh <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.bug-tracking.request-tracker.user
Message-ID <CAHgBc-uUFZNeqnMJBq9h1+zyKoGyzxmm1=C_qEyDjUpGwJNpnw@mail.gmail.com>
I don't think Re matters. As long as subject tag is intact it should get
parsed correctly.

--
Nilesh

On 31-Oct-2016 7:35 PM, "Alex Hall" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I looked more closely at the difference. Outlook is stripping off the "Re:
> " part of the message subject in the reply, whereas Gmail leaves it on.
> That's the only difference I can find, but it must matter. I guess this is
> more an Outlook question now, unless there's something I can change in RT
> to make it not care about the Re: part of a reply?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 31, 2016, at 09:52, Nilesh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 31-Oct-2016 7:10 PM, "Alex Hall" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> > I made a custom template with mailto: links in it, that comes from
> [email protected]. The mailto: links populate the to: and subject:
> fields of the new message as they should, and when the new email is sent, a
> comment appears on the ticket. At least, if the user does this from the
> Gmail website (our domain mail is handled by Gmail). If the user is on
> Outlook, however, the "reply" gets turned into a new ticket. I can't see
> what the difference is, since the mailto: link is the same. We're on
> Outlook 2007, at least the few stations I've asked so far use 2007. Has
> anyone ever seen this before? Any troubleshooting suggestions? Thank you.
> >
> > --
> > Alex Hall
> > Automatic Distributors, IT department
> > [email protected]
> >
> > ---------
> > RT 4.4 and RTIR training sessions, and a new workshop day!
> https://bestpractical.com/training
> > * Los Angeles - Q1 2017
>
> Have you verified that the subject tag isn't getting stripped?
>
> There are two ways to identify a reply - one via the subject and other via
> in-reply-to header which most clients insert. In-reply-to isn't parsed by
> RT, so a custom code is needed for that.
>
> I got it from someone on this list and have implemented as a local
> customization.
>
> --
> Nilesh
>
> ---------
> RT 4.4 and RTIR training sessions, and a new workshop day!
> https://bestpractical.com/training
> * Los Angeles - Q1 2017
>
>

---------
RT 4.4 and RTIR training sessions, and a new workshop day! https://bestpractical.com/training
* Los Angeles - Q1 2017
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.